What Is Barometric Altimeter?
One of the biggest novelties is probably a barometric altimeter. But what exactly is it and why is it better than its predecessor GPS altimeter?
One of the important information every cyclist and runner needs is the altitude of the terrain. GPS altimeter works fine in theory but when dealing with dynamic terrain such as in the mountains GPS gets inaccurate.
Here the new barometric altimeter kicks in. It works really smooth and its precision is outstanding.
Users can also use a correction mechanism, which receives data right from NASA and is accurate to about a meter.
This entry was posted by Admin on October 8, 2011 at 10:27 am, and is filed under General. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0.You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
-
#2 written by Admin 7 months ago
@Baz: this is an unofficial blog!
I understand the barometer issue and am looking into it but Garmin has not revealed all information.
I believe that Garmin has come a long way and will try to get a monopoly over sports watches – they won’t let us down.
I had an opportunity to test 310 XT and was fully satisfied but rough up/down terrain made the altitude meter a bit unpredictable(I was going down and it showed the same value). I personally did not care a lot because when downloading info to a PC all seemed in place and accurate.
-
Hey, sorry for thinking this was an official blog! i was actually mistaken by the domain name !
Anyway, as i said, i hope Garmin has come up with a product that work as it is supposed to because on the paper, this come close to the device i’m looking for and i’m really thinking about getting this one. Overall, my message on barometer is that it is not necessarily better than a GPS if the software behind is crap. If you have a good line of sight with the sky, gps is pretty accurate for what pertains to altitude (5-6 meter precision). of course if you are in a canyon this won’t be much of an help
For some users, accurate data after the competition is not enough. Cumulated elevation is really helpful to know what efforts remains to be done and how to use the energy you have. Just to give an example, during my last competition, i was supposed to have 24,000 meters of positive elevation at the end. My foretrex 401, with a barometer indicated 33,000 meters and it had an altimeter and when i watched it the altitude was relatively correct so obviously Garmin is doing something (very) wrong !
if like me this data is important to you, maybe wait to be sure everything is going well with elevation. Otherwise, you’ll find brand new Forerunner 310XT for around 200 Euros on ebay !
Thanks for sharing information on this devices
Regards,
Basile -


Hi, seems like this blog is the official blog from Garmin ! Anyway, the 910XT seems to be almost the perfect watch for ultra mountain racing …
… True that the barometer is an expected and nice feature. It is actually the reason why i purchased the Garmin foretrex 401. Unfortunately, the calibration of the barometer is working very bad and the cumulated elevation data are completely inaccurate and it seems garmin never corrected this !
So my question is, how differently is barometer implemented in the 910xt? No need to have a barometer if it is not correctly used. Besides, there is no mention anywhere from cumulated elevation as available data. Is it something that the 910xt will provide right from the beginning (or will we have to wait for a firmware update?)
Don’t get me wrong, i love what you guys are doing but even if it is rather the exception, some of your products are a shame (Foretrex 401 is the example that comes to my mind). It seems this product is the one i need but be honnest with people that really need this feature, if barometer is not working properly, the 310 XT is probably a far better choice for us, mountain runners!
Best regards,
Basile